| Re: 2 new mailings | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Carol Koepp (carolkoepp |
|
| Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 21:47:30 -0700 (PDT) | |
I will watch it for sure. Having the same values without the theism is what
makes us unique when working with folks coming from a theistic base, i.e.,
Habitat For Humanity and the Downtown Congregations to End Homelessness.
They have a hard time figuring us out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Tapp" <tappx001 [at] umn.edu>
To: "Carol Koepp" <carolkoepp [at] comcast.net> Cc: "FUS Social Action talk" <fussa-talk [at] muusja.org> Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 11:06 PM Subject: [sa-talk] 2 new mailings
Both deal with humanists' values and how best to make them visible and exciting. Bob Begin forwarded message:From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu> Date: July 3, 2009 10:51:57 PM CDT To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org> Subject: We few Bill Moyers Journal tonight should be a must for humanists. An earlier post described a course on social ethics that was available online, Tonight Miyers quizzed the 3 professors -- Cornel West, Serene Jones, and Gary Dorrien -- on how their progressive version of Christianity helped them understand the present economic crisis. http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/index-flash.html Moyers pushed the fact that there were many other versions of Christianity, and they agreed. In fact they argued that their version only started around 1880 in the US and certainly was not a majority version today. That "social gospel" is one of the major sources of our own modern humanism. Our 1033 Manifesto argued that the values of that earlier movement could no longer be well served from a theistic base. Moyers pushed each speaker hard on whether their theistic assumptions were necessary, AND all agreed that many who did not share heir beliefs in fact did share their values. They were also agreed that traditional forms of Christianity were unable to understand or deal with the crisis. One statement by Serene Jones (new president of Union Theological Seminary) came very close to a sermonic definition of modern humanism. Love is the most important value (some of us are more likely to prefer <compassion>) and <justice is love with legs>.. Do watch this discussion for a better understanding of progressive Christianity -- and our relation to it. BobBegin forwarded message:From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu> Date: July 3, 2009 11:01:37 PM CDT To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org> Subject: Shared values The Vatican will soon be receiving President Obama, and Benedictine Sister Joan Chittister wonders whether those same bishops who recently criticized Notre Dame will persist in their position! More significantly, she discusses some of the ethical themes of a major forthcoming encyclical, Veritas in Caritate, Humanists will want to rad this closely since it comes from the largest group of Christians. We too urge values that serve <the common good>. What overlaps exit? Are we more consistent in promoting those values than people who claim they rest upon supernaturalism? http://ncronline.org/news/politics/voice-reason-maelstrom-condemnations Bob__________________________________________________________________ First Unitarian Society Social Action TALKTo unsubscribe, update address, see archives of message, or subscribe, go to:http://muusja.org/FUSsa
-
2 new mailings Robert Tapp, July 3 2009
- Re: 2 new mailings Carol Koepp, July 3 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.