| Re: Fwd: Science and the US public | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Carol Koepp (carolkoepp |
|
| Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:37:20 -0700 (PDT) | |
Kerri Miller devoted an hour to this topic this morning. According to her
guest, one contributing factor is the use of the word "theory". Theory, as
scientists usethe word is different than the way the general public uses it.
Rules are connected to arriving at a scientific theory while the public sees
theory as an optional belief.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Tapp" <tappx001 [at] umn.edu>
To: "Carol Koepp" <carolkoepp [at] comcast.net> Cc: <n.edu [at] tigertech.net>; "FUS Social Action talk" <fussa-talk [at] muusja.org> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 5:01 PM Subject: [sa-talk] Fwd: Science and the US public
Begin forwarded message:From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu> Date: July 10, 2009 4:25:36 PM CDT To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org> Subject: Science and the US public Humanists base their worldview on the sciences -- and many US neighbor do not. THe latest Pew Forum study documents that sad fact. Several things follow. Our public education system must do a much better job in these areas. And humanists cannot expect many recruits from that under/mis-educated segment of the public. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/science/10survey.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper Bob__________________________________________________________________ First Unitarian Society Social Action TALKTo unsubscribe, update address, see archives of message, or subscribe, go to:http://muusja.org/FUSsa
-
Fwd: Science and the US public Robert Tapp, July 10 2009
- Re: Fwd: Science and the US public Carol Koepp, July 10 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.