Re: Fwd: Science and the US public
From: Carol Koepp (carolkoeppcomcast.net)
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Kerri Miller devoted an hour to this topic this morning. According to her guest, one contributing factor is the use of the word "theory". Theory, as scientists usethe word is different than the way the general public uses it. Rules are connected to arriving at a scientific theory while the public sees theory as an optional belief. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Tapp" <tappx001 [at] umn.edu>
To: "Carol Koepp" <carolkoepp [at] comcast.net>
Cc: <n.edu [at] tigertech.net>; "FUS Social Action talk" <fussa-talk [at] 
muusja.org>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 5:01 PM
Subject: [sa-talk] Fwd: Science and the US public




Begin forwarded message:

From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu>
Date: July 10, 2009 4:25:36 PM CDT
To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org>
Subject: Science and the US public

Humanists base their worldview on the sciences -- and many US
neighbor do not. THe latest Pew Forum study documents that sad fact.
Several things follow. Our public education system must do a much
better job in these areas. And humanists cannot expect many recruits
from that under/mis-educated segment of the public.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/science/10survey.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

Bob

__________________________________________________________________
First Unitarian Society Social Action TALK
To unsubscribe, update address, see archives of message, or subscribe, go to:
http://muusja.org/FUSsa



Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.