| Fwd: Understanding our <progressive Christian> neighbors | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Robert Tapp (tappx001 |
|
| Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:54:30 -0700 (PDT) | |
Begin forwarded message:
From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu> Date: August 27, 2009 10:51:45 AM CDT To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org> Subject: Understanding our <progressive Christian> neighborsSeveral writers in the humanist camp have been arguing that liberal/ progressive religionists simply serve as covers and fronts for the conservative/reactionary bulk of members of those groups.Peter Laarman argues here that innovations (heresies) have been and still can be the tomorrows of religions.http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/religionandtheology/1787/the_unbelieving_future_of_christian_faithHumanists need to empiricize these arguments by doing careful religion history. Go beyond the scriptures and the leaders to the ordinary believers and their impacts. Would the future for developed countries then be projected as secularized Europe? Or as the religions-many-but-lite US.It may be that the lite/spiritual types have indeed abandoned past dogmatic rigidity, but at this point the reactionary political values seem highly correlated. Healthcare? Torture? Militarism? Misogyny? Anti-science? Faith trumping reason? Sexuality rigidity?Bob
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.