Fwd: More on the New Atheism issues
From: Robert Tapp (tappx001umn.edu)
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:08:56 -0800 (PST)


Begin forwarded message:

From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu>
Date: November 6, 2009 5:46:09 PM CST
To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org>

Start with Karen Armstrong's Foreign Policy article

        http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/10/19/god_0?page=0,1

Then Brian Davis sharp critique of her fuzzy apologetics in Religion Dispatches
        
        http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/rdbook/1930/

Then read Lisa Armstrong's Newsweek qualifier

        http://www.newsweek.com/id/219009

Then Eric Reitan's commentary on Collision
        
        http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/mediaculture/1986/

Then Meg White's nicely-nuanced critique for BuzzFlash

        http://blog.buzzflash.com/analysis/937

In all this media excitement, humanists should be making their case more insistently that the real issue is in value conflicts -- where religions certainly make impacts but are so varied internally that they can only be decisive for their own particular devotees. That's where the humanist insistence upon reasoned discussion and empirical evaluation of consequences comes in. And it's where umbrella categories such as Religion, Christianity, Islam reveal themselves as meaningless. Try stem-cells and abortion, or pre-emptive war, or contraception, or climate, or freedom of conscience!

Bob









  • (no other messages in thread)

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.