| Fwd: Robert P. George | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Robert Tapp (tappx001 |
|
| Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:20:57 -0800 (PST) | |
Begin forwarded message: > From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] UMN.EDU> > Date: December 20, 2009 11:19:18 AM CST > To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org> > > > David Kirkpatrick's long essay on this major conservative thinker deserves > close attention. George is the key figure in the Manhattan Declaration and a > key narrower of the Catholic focus on sexuality. > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/magazine/20george-t.html?ref=todayspaper > > On the surface, his appeals to <reason> rather than faith and dogma will have > wide appeal. Humanists need to emphasize that he refers to a classical form > of reason that was the basis of philosophical idealism. (Using reason that > way, Anselm proved that God existed!). The <reasoning> that dominates > pragmatic thinking lost that absolutism and was more closely linked to > experience and feeling. > > The classical assurances about nature and human nature gave way to modern > science. As we learned more about actual human beings, simplistic > generalizations about man/woman became more nuanced. George's philosophy > still sees anything other than heterosexuality as some kind of willed > deviance. Similarly, he holds contraception to be an actual unreasonable > denial of what he claims as the purpose of sexuality - procreation and > bonding. Those 2 issues may be the greatest popular shortcomings in this new > puritanism of the Christian Right. > > On the philosophical level, the claim to be entering the public arena with > some kind of <universal reason> may be a tougher claim to unseat. > > Bob >
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.