| Fwd: The roles played by abortion | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Robert Tapp (tappx001 |
|
| Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:48:24 -0800 (PST) | |
Begin forwarded message: > From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu> > Date: January 23, 2010 1:00:05 PM EST > To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org> > > > Carol Joffe, author of an insightful new book, interviewed by Lynn Harris on > Salon. > > > http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2010/01/22/abortion_dispatches_interview/index.html > > The potency of this wedge issue again showed in the Congressional bills and > their amendments by Stupak and Nelson. Humanists need to keep reminding our > neighbors that 2. this is a useful political issue for far-right crazies, and > 1. that it obscures all the serious ethical issues of responsible > reproduction. > > On the #2 issue, Joffe makes a good case for ways that the issue has been used > >> I have come to understand the abortion wars as a brilliant distraction that >> drains energies and resources away from other social needs, including the >> adequate provision of services that would allow people to have the intimate >> and family lives they wish for. > > > On issue #1, she helps us remember that we humans are also sexual animals who > build cultures that both exaggerate our sexualoties and try to control and > channel them. > >> the sexual schizophrenia we do here, where we have thongs for girls but "Our >> Bodies, Our Selves" banned from libraries. We are a society deeply >> conflicted about sexuality, especially female sexuality. > > > Clearly religions have been used as heavy players in the abortion wars since > they rely on beliefs and slogans remote from reality-testing. Joffe urges us > to discover how many European countries included reproductive rights into > their health systems -- with the clear results of reducing unwanted > pregnancies and therefore abortions. She rightly sees this resisted here by > theocratic factions. The too-little recognized fact of spontaneous abortions > should be used to show the absurdity of such religious slogans as <life > begins at conception>. After Obama was safely (?) elected, I published on > that issue > >> “Is God the Supreme Abortionist?” Religion Dispatches, Dec. 11, 2008 > > Now that corporatist interests have derailed serious legislative changes -- > and been freed by the activist and conservative Supreme Court 5 to become > even more dominant in the political process -- we can expect <pro-life> > policies and restrictions to flourish more and succeed more. > > Bob > >
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.