| Fwd: *Sightings* 7/15/10 -- American Idolatry: The King James Version | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Robert Tapp (tappx001 |
|
| Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:56:36 -0700 (PDT) | |
Begin forwarded message: > From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu> > Date: July 15, 2010 12:54:11 PM CDT > To: Humanist Institute Discussion Group Discussion Group <hidisc [at] > humanistinstitute.org> > > > Even if you are not a basketball fan, these reflections upon what has > displaced serious news recently in MSM will prove valuable. In addition, they > can remind humanists of the ways that religious usages of words have pervaded > popular patois. To me, that is one more warning that we must understand our > varied audiences' understandings of words if we are to communicate with > minimal ambiguities. > > A word like <faith> may have acquired non-traditional restrictions/meanings > for long-time Ethical Culture or UU members BUT this does not mean that it > will connote these for newcomers or outsiders or traditional religionists. > > We at the Institute (and thus on this passworded list) are operating at a > graduate-level of intellectuality (our literature so insists!). That means we > cannot pretend innocence of history when it comes to philosophical and > theological matters. Nor can we get by with idiosyncratic claims about what > words <really mean> or <should mean>. Pace Santayana and the price we pay for > not knowing history. > > For most EuroAmericans, faith, basically, refers to believing despite > evidence or despite an absence of evidence. It is thus the term to invoke > when <reason>, <knowledge>, proof> are not appropriate. > > If you won't take my word for this, go back to Aquinas who argued quite > clearly that we can't both <know> and <believe> a single proposition. They > are simply contrary modes of assurance! By the way, he preferred knowledge > whenever we could discover it. > > Bob > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Sightings <ktobey [at] uchicago.edu> >> Date: July 15, 2010 9:10:28 AM CDT >> To: sightings [at] lists.uchicago.edu >> Subject: *Sightings* 7/15/10 -- American Idolatry: The King James Version >> >> Sightings 7/15/10 >> >> >> American Idolatry: The King James Version >> -- M. Cooper Harriss >> >> Americans have “a thing” for the Decalogue, displaying it publicly – >> wherever a court injunction for its removal might be evaded – alongside >> American flags and presidential portraits. Early in these ten commandments, >> we learn that YHWH forbids idolatry: “Thou shalt not make unto thee any >> graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that >> is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: thou shalt >> not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them” (Exodus 20:4-5). The >> foregoing translation comes from the “Authorized” or “King James” version of >> the Bible. This week another “King James” looms large: LeBron James, the >> American basketball player who last week announced his intentions to leave >> his “hometown” Cleveland Cavaliers (James is an Akron, Ohio native) to sign >> with the Miami Heat in the most scrutinized and hyperbolized free agent >> signing in American sporting history. >> >> The ordeal that came to be known as “LeBronikah” serves as a broad critical >> accounting of our days and our distractions, and simultaneously offers an >> intriguing opportunity for exploring the religious valences of this profane >> festival of highlights. James’s nicknames – the biblically evocative “King >> James” and the Messianic “Chosen One” – carry heavy religious inflections. >> Nike, who pays James more than he’ll ever make playing basketball to wear >> and hawk its paraphernalia, advertises that “We are all witnesses” to >> James’s miracles, though they fall short of encouraging us to tell no one of >> what we have seen. >> >> More fascinating is the willingness of other actors to play along. Shortly >> after the announcement, Dan Gilbert, majority owner of the Cleveland >> Cavaliers, posted an incensed open letter on the team’s website, mocking >> James’s authenticity to the point of demythologization (he places “King,” >> “witnessed,” and other adulatory language in scare quotes) and offering a >> soteriological critique of his former employee (“Some people think they >> should go to heaven but NOT have to die to get there”) before weighing in on >> the blessing and the curse of the entire situation: >> >> But the good news is that this heartless and callous action can >> only serve >> as the antidote to the so-called "curse" on Cleveland, Ohio. >> >> >> The self-declared former "King" will be taking the "curse" with him down >> south. And until he does "right" by Cleveland and Ohio, James (and the town >> where he plays) will unfortunately own this dreaded spell and bad karma. >> >> Curses, atonement, scapegoating, and even karma appear in the theological >> buckshot of Gilbert’s remarks. Such harsh words might prove gratifying were >> they not also the calculated attempt of a man who has profited immeasurably >> from James’s popularity and success over the past seven years to capitalize >> upon public outrage in his team’s favor. His demythologization, arriving in >> the wake of a free agent’s freely-made decision to depart, not only rings >> hollow but becomes doubly problematic when one considers that he, James’s >> “owner” in a system frequently compared to antebellum plantations, was more >> than willing to reap riches from his metaphysical “baller” for the better >> part of a decade, and hoped to continue doing so for the foreseeable future. >> >> James became the new scapegoat for Cleveland and Ohio, a suffering region >> that, the pundits say, has seen better days and sorely needs the hope that >> James represented. Appropriately, the decision initiated rites of sacrifice >> as fans burned number 23 James jerseys to purify themselves of the betrayal. >> The Internet plays an interesting role in this ritualization of grief. >> The sports website Deadspin compiled more than a dozen videos from YouTube >> of fans burning James’s jersey. Gawker, Deadspin’s sister site, noted a >> growing trend of homemade videos in which fans filmed their (distraught) >> reactions to James’s decision as the announcement happened, bringing the >> proverbial sackcloth and ashes to YouTube’s mandate to “broadcast yourself” >> in almost real time – an interesting twenty-first century revision of >> traditionally conceived modes of public outcry and communal mourning. >> >> What, finally, does the LeBron James decision say about our present cultural >> occasion? It reveals idolatry, to be sure, in how we find distraction in >> less-than-ultimate concerns and delude ourselves into believing that the >> idol is without fracture; that money, agility, and fame matter more in the >> grander scheme of justice than compassion, humanity, and love. But, while >> true, such diagnoses avoid the more trenchant valences of this occasion. >> Sightings periodically turns to sporting events because they reflect >> something profound about peoples’ cultural imaginations. Christian >> Sheppard’s observations about baseball and American football, and Joseph >> Price’s reflections upon the Super Bowl, for instance, suggest that the >> highest levels of athletic competition reveal something transcendent in >> human striving – virtue, courage, the sanctification of national identity. >> Following their examples, then, we are left to measure what this all means: >> the manufactured outrage over disloyalty, our marketplace of allegiances as >> fans, idols, and saviors. What do such properties convey about the social >> order we inhabit, which we reflect in the myths we create, and destroy, >> together? Nike has this much right: We are all witnesses. Accordingly, >> may we neither bear such witness falsely nor overlook the insights that >> these myths reveal. >> >> >> >> References: >> >> Dan Gilbert’s open letter may be found here: >> http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/news/gilbert_letter_100708.html >> >> For more on comparisons of the NBA’s division of labor to American slavery, >> please see Mark Anthony Neal’s Soul Babies: Black Popular Culture and the >> Post-Soul Aesthetic (London and New York: Routledge, 2002). >> >> http://deadspin.com/5583347/a-lebron+jersey+burning+video-roundup (Please >> note: Deadspin features satire that some readers may find crass or vulgar.) >> >> http://gawker.com/5582924/here-are-people-overreacting-to-lebron-james-decision-to-join-the-miami-heat/gallery/ >> >> Read Christian Sheppard here: >> http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/archive_2005/0811.shtml >> http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/archive_2006/0202.shtml >> >> Read Joseph Price here: >> http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/sightings/archive_2005/0210.shtml >> >> >> M. Cooper Harriss, a former junior fellow in the Martin Marty Center and >> editor of The Religion and Culture Web Forum, is a Ph.D. candidate in >> Religion and Literature at the University of Chicago Divinity School. Next >> month he becomes Visiting Assistant Professor of Race and Religion in the >> Department of Religion and Culture at Virginia Tech. >> >> ---------- >> In this month's Religion and Culture Web Forum ("The Primacy of Rhetoric"), >> Marty Center Senior Fellow (2009-10) W. David Hall addresses the centrality >> of rhetoric in the Western humanist tradition by engaging the work of >> Ernesto Grassi, whose commentary on the Renaissance, especially, diverged >> from standard Platonic models of interpretation to include arts such as >> rhetoric, literature, and poetry. Of especial interest for Hall is Grassi's >> "retrieval of the humanist tradition" during this era and the possibilities >> that thorough understanding of such a retrieval opens more broadly in the >> fields of philosophy and religious studies. With invited responses by >> Jeffrey Jay (University of Chicago), Santiago Pinon (University of Chicago), >> Donald Phillip Verene (Emory University), and Glenn Whitehouse (Florida Gulf >> Coast University). >> http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/webforum/index.shtml >> >> ---------- >> Sightings comes from the Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago >> Divinity School. >> >> Submissions policy >> >> Sightings welcomes submissions of 500 to 750 words in length that seek to >> illuminate and interpret the forces of faith in a pluralist society. >> Previous columns give a good indication of the topical range and tone for >> acceptable essays. The editor also encourages new approaches to issues >> related to religion and public life. >> >> Attribution >> >> Columns may be quoted or republished in full, with attribution to the author >> of the column, Sightings, and the Martin Marty Center at the University of >> Chicago Divinity School. >> >> Contact information >> >> Please send all inquiries, comments, and submissions to Kristen Tobey, >> managing editor of Sightings, at ktobey [at] uchicago.edu. Subscribe, >> unsubscribe, or manage your subscription at the Sightings subscription page. >> Too many emails? Receive Sightings as an RSS feed: sign up at >> http://divinity.uchicago.edu/rss/sightings.xml. >
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.