| Fwd: Themes for the appeal | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Robert Tapp (tappx001 |
|
| Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:04:01 -0700 (PDT) | |
Begin forwarded message: > From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu> > Date: August 5, 2010 6:01:26 PM CDT > To: Humanist Institute Discussion Group Discussion Group <hidisc [at] > humanistinstitute.org> > > > Judge Walker's decision on Prop. 8 is indeed momentous. This critique from > Albert Mohler suggests some of the arguments in the appeal. It also show the > moral pretensions of a large bloc of US Christian, Jewish, and Muslim > religionists. Most of the things he rejects as arguments (he calls them > <secularization>) are well-established social facts. They thus figure more > strongly in determining human rights than personal opinions of voters. Parts > of the country would still have poll taxes and segregation if the prejudices > of local voters could remain enshrined in law. > > > http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/augustweb-only/41.41.0.html?start=1 > > Bob >
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.