| Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Marcy Leussler (mleussler |
|
| Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:06:05 -0700 (PDT) | |
I think that we should have a conversation in SAC meetings about what it means to "sponsor" or "co-sponsor" an event. I think "sponsorship" means that a number of SAC members are heavily involved in the event, are attending the event and helping with it. If we sponsor something, we should be there, in force, to do the work. Also, if it is an outside group, it should be voted on at an SAC meeting -- that needs a lot of lead time. Personally, I think that this should happen very infrequently for causes that we are already working on or connected with, that it makes good sense to co-sponsor. If we are not already connected with the group that wants to use our space, we need to look carefully at whether it is something that we should sponsor. My bottom line - SAC should be heavily involved in anything that we co-sponsor. Marcy > From: carolkoepp [at] comcast.net > Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:24:31 -0500 > Subject: Re: [sa-talk] Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE > To: mleussler [at] hotmail.com > > The problem with using the power point equip is that we would also have to > pay a staff person to be there when they wouldn't ordinarily be there, so it > would be an expense to us. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carole Rydberg" > To: "Carol Koepp" > Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 8:19 AM > Subject: Re: [sa-talk] Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE > > >> Adele's position makes sense to me. Friendship Force initially had >> planned to pay and I am willing to use my $100 credit to reduce their >> cost. They do have membership dues and a treasury. I think that Social >> Action can occasionally co-sponsor something if it is a big event and is >> likely to draw large crowds to FUS (or if it is a worthy cause that is >> penniless) but it would be unfair to the Society if FUS Social Action >> co-sponsored all worthwhile events by outside groups. I do feel, >> however, that they should be able to use power point equipment without >> an additional charge. Does that seem fair? >> Carole Rydberg >> __________________________________________________________________ >> First Unitarian Society Social Action TALK >> To unsubscribe, update address, see archives of message, or subscribe, go >> to: >> http://muusja.org/FUSsa >> > > __________________________________________________________________ > First Unitarian Society Social Action TALK > To unsubscribe, update address, see archives of message, or subscribe, go to: > http://muusja.org/FUSsa > _________________________________________________________________ The i’m Talkathon starts 6/24/08. For now, give amongst yourselves. http://www.imtalkathon.com?source=TXT_EML_WLH_LearnMore_GiveAmongst
- Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE, (continued)
-
Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE Carol Koepp, June 26 2008
- Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE Joan Schneider, June 27 2008
-
Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE Carole Rydberg, June 28 2008
- Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE Carol Koepp, June 28 2008
- Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE Marcy Leussler, June 30 2008
- Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE Carole Rydberg, July 1 2008
- Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE hanse002, July 1 2008
- Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE Robert Tapp, July 1 2008
- Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE MADELINE SIMON, July 1 2008
-
Re: Update on Friendship Force NEW VOTE Carol Koepp, June 26 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.