| Fwd: "Natural" law and our sexuality | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Robert Tapp (rtapp4 |
|
| Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:16:56 -0800 (PST) | |
Begin forwarded message: > From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu> > Date: January 3, 2010 9:12:43 AM EST > To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org> > > Nathaniel Frank does a good job dissecting Robert George's sloppy arguments > for old and <new> natural law theories as condemnatory of homosexual > behaviors (as well as many other normal sexual behaviors!). > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathaniel-frank/gay-rights-and-the-natura_b_399322.html > > One might add to this argument the fact that failure is almost as frequent a > result of human conceptions as eventual birth -- and argument that I made in > a posting last year. > > > http://web.me.com/rtapp4/Main/General_files/Is%20God%20the%20Supreme%20Abortionist-all.pdf > > Given the state of US education and public discourse, alas, we can expect > heavy conservative bloviation along such fuzzy but well-financed paths. > > Bob
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.