Fwd: "Natural" law and our sexuality
From: Robert Tapp (rtapp4me.com)
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:16:56 -0800 (PST)

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Robert Tapp <tappx001 [at] umn.edu>
> Date: January 3, 2010 9:12:43 AM EST
> To: Humanist Institute Discussion List <hidisc [at] humanistinstitute.org>
> 
> Nathaniel Frank does a good job dissecting Robert George's sloppy arguments 
> for old and <new> natural law theories as condemnatory of homosexual 
> behaviors (as well as many other normal sexual behaviors!).
> 
>       
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathaniel-frank/gay-rights-and-the-natura_b_399322.html
> 
> One might add to this argument the fact that failure is almost as frequent a 
> result of human conceptions as eventual birth -- and argument that I made in 
> a posting last year.
> 
>       
> http://web.me.com/rtapp4/Main/General_files/Is%20God%20the%20Supreme%20Abortionist-all.pdf
> 
> Given the state of US education and public discourse, alas, we can expect 
> heavy conservative bloviation along such fuzzy but well-financed paths.
> 
> Bob


  • (no other messages in thread)

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.